Water Quality Can Affect Livestock Weight Gain
By Roxanne Johnson, Agriculture Communication, North Dakota State University.
Studies indicate water quality is tied to forage consumption in livestock, which has an impact on weight gain.
The quality of the water livestock drink can have a major impact on the animals’ water intake and weight gain, according to a North Dakota State University water quality expert.
“Canadian studies have shown the quality of water accessible to livestock is directly tied to the amount of forage they consume,” says Roxanne Johnson, Extension Service water quality associate. “Improved water palatability increases water and feed consumption, which is demonstrated as an increased rate of gain.”
State Veterinarian suggests precautions
by Dave Russell
With the latest foot and mouth disease outbreak in the United Kingdom, Indiana State Veterinarian Dr. Bret Marsh is urging livestock producers here to take precautions.
“They need to be cognizant of who comes on and off their operations, that they continue to observe their animals, so if they see abnormal signs particularly with foot and mouth disease where there are blisters or vesicles on teats, on snouts of pigs, or the mouths of cattle, that if those are signs they see to be to call a veterinarian or the Board of Animal Health (BOAH) and we’ll get help to the site to make a final determination,” said Dr. Marsh. “It’s a time to be particularly diligent, making sure we’re watching those animals and aware of what’s going on in our populations.”
Veterinarians and BQA
By Dee Griffin
In 1982, the United States Department of Agriculture-Food Safety Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) began working with the beef industry in the United States to develop the Pre-Harvest Beef Safety Production Program. The beef industry adopted the term Beef Quality Assurance (BQA). The BQA program is a cooperative effort between beef producers, veterinarians, nutritionists, Extension staff and other professionals, and asks them to follow accepted guidelines for product use and to use common sense, reasonable management skills and accepted scientific knowledge to avoid product defects at the consumer level. Its goal is to ensure the consumer that all cattle shipped from a beef production unit are healthy, wholesome and safe, and their management has met FDA, USDA and EPA standards.
Harkin: GAO finds weakness in USDA’s animal ID plan
A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report requested by Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) and released today found weaknesses in USDA’s plan to implement a national animal identification system. Harkin asked GAO to examine USDA’s animal ID plan in November 2005 after concerns were raised that USDA was not effectively implementing the system and not informing producers and livestock market operators how much the system will cost their operations. Harkin is chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry.
In response to concerns about animal disease outbreaks, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced in December 2003 that it would implement a nationwide program — later named the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) — to help producers and animal health officials respond quickly and effectively to animal disease outbreaks in the United States.
Match Forage Supplies to Livestock Needs Calculator
Ropin’ the Web
As we progress through the fall, weaning and breeding stock retention decisions are being made. Producers are checking feed supplies and estimating additional purchases required and/or how many head they will be feeding on their farms over the winter feeding season.
The “Drought Options” article, “Beef Cow-Calf Operation Reduction Strategies” lays out a straight forward process for estimating the number of head you will be able to winter on your existing forages supplies (or conversely, how much extra forage you will need to maintain your breeding herd and/or retained calves). As producers’ time is best spent assessing the strategy that best suits their operations, a few Alberta Agriculture staff teamed up to develop a quick “calculator” to estimate potential forage shortfalls or surpluses associated with each of the management options producers may have in mind.
Six ways to monitor and measure the success of a management program.
by Kindra Gordon
Why is it that some ranch operations are viable and profitable when others are not? Most would agree that the answer to business success — whether operating a ranch entity or a Fortune 500 company — lies in management and planning.
Successful management is the ability to look toward the future, embrace new concepts and technologies, and implement a well-thought-out plan that complements all aspects of the business.
FULL STORY PDF
Forage Focus: Stockpiling Fescue
Stockpiling fescue for most producers requires the least effort and is the cheapest winter feeding option available. Stockpiling is easy. First make the last cutting or grazing, anytime from the end of July through September. Keep in mind, the earlier you start, the higher the yield, but the lower the quality. Also the later you start, the higher the quality, but with a lower yield.
After the last cut or graze then add nitrogen (N). The addition of N when stockpiling begins will result in increased yields. Trials have shown an economical response from 40 to 100 pounds of actual N per acre. We recommend fifty pounds actual N per acre. If clovers are in the stand then the N may not be needed. Research shows little response to N application where the stand consists of more than 40% red clover. Make sure it is a stable form of nitrogen. Applications of urea-based fertilizers in summer result in losses of nitrogen due to nitrogen volatilization.