Daily Archives: October 18, 2006

Animal ID plan drawing grumbles from small farmers

Animal ID plan drawing grumbles from small farmers

By Virginia Wietecha, Carroll County News (AR)

GREEN FOREST – An animal identification system, that will eventually allow farmers to scan their cattle like grocery items, is currently a highly debated topic not only in Carroll County, but also in the state of Arkansas.

“We are hoping to get it stalled off and keep it on a voluntary basis,” said Harold Logan, legislative chairman of the Carroll County Farm Bureau. “There’s getting to be quite a bit of opposition because farmers are beginning to wake-up and see that it’s going to be a burden.”

The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) was initiated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture following the discovery of a mad cow case in Washington state.


Not surprisingly, farmers resent rustlers

Not surprisingly, farmers resent rustlers

By Clint Confehr

Shelbyville Times-Gazette (TN)

UNIONVILLE — An early winter dip in beef cattle prices hasn’t wiped out their increased value since this time last year, so cattle rustling might be seen as attractive. But folks at the stockyard here see it as a character flaw.

“The cattle business is built on a whole lot of trust,” said Tommy Burgess, co-owner of the Mid-South Livestock Center on Highway 41-A North where his partner, Christina McKee, said news of cattle rustling “has been all the buzz here this morning.”

Every Monday, cattlemen from across Middle Tennessee come to buy and sell beef cattle at the stockyard and its customers’ comments carried a couple of common themes when they were asked if higher prices motivated rustling.


Cloned meat, milk

Cloned meat, milk

Sunjournal.com (OR)

WASHINGTON (AP) – The government said Tuesday it is moving closer to approving meat and milk from cloned animals, drawing protests from consumer groups.

The Bush administration is currently reviewing Food and Drug Administration plans to regulate cloned animals and food derived from them, the agency said in a statement. A draft of the plans should be released by the end of the year, FDA said.

The agency has “studies that show that the meat and milk from cattle clones and their offspring are as safe as that from conventionally bred animals,” the FDA statement said.


Creekstone’s Stewart Retires

Creekstone’s Stewart Retires

Angus Journal

John Stewart, founder and chief executive of Arkansas City, Kan.-based Creekstone Farms Inc., is retiring from the company, although he will remain active as an investor and advisor concentrating on governmental relations, according to Meatingplace.com. He will also remain on the board of the American Meat Institute (AMI) representing Creekstone.

Stewart and his wife, Carol, founded the company in 1995 as an Angus seedstock operation, and in 2001 re-launched it as a branded Angus beef program. In 2003, the company purchased the Arkansas City plant and opened a global business in exporting premium beef to Asian and European customers.

Bill McSwain will run the company’s day-to-day operations while a search for a new chief executive is conducted,

The Murky Murk

The Murky Murk

By Wes Ishmael

Beef Magazine

They came. They saw. They left.

Participants at the ID Info/Expo in August — the defacto national forum for developing and advancing a standardized national ID system — wanted answers about the National Animal Identification System (NAIS). They were disappointed.

USDA officials continued to evade some of producers’ most rudimentary questions about NAIS, such as its cost, whether it will be mandatory and how and when the system will be implemented.


Effective communication

Effective communication

By Greg Henderson, Drovers Journal

If you make your living operating a ranch or feedyard, your days are filled with an array of tasks that require you to be an expert in many fields. One minute you may be fixing a broken wire in a fence, and the next minute you may be talking on a cell phone with a commodity broker making a marketing decision that can dramatically affect your income for the year.

The everyday stress of managing a cattle operation can be exhaustive for even the best of managers. And even just a little time away from the ranch or the feedyard can be beneficial. Maybe it’s a long weekend away with your spouse, or maybe it’s just a one-day trip to a nearby city for an industry meeting. That time away can be restful, but it can also put you in contact with some of the most important people in your lifebeef consumers. Are you prepared for that contact?

If your business is producing beef, people outside of the industry may expect you to be able to answer a variety of questions about beef production. To help you prepare for those important encounters with consumers, this issue of Drovers is devoted to providing you with beef industry talking points, concise answers to questions consumers may ask you about beef.


Beef checkoff program celebrates 20th anniversary

Beef checkoff program celebrates 20th anniversary

From the Cattlemen’s Beef Board

American Cowman

Halley’s Comet paid a visit, the Soviet Union’s Chernobyl accident shocked the world and President Ronald Reagan approved sweeping revisions of the U.S. tax code. The year was 1986, and among the news that directly affected beef producers was implementation of a $1-per-head assessment on cattle sold to fund a nationwide effort to increase demand for beef.

Established as part of the 1985 Farm Bill, the checkoff assesses $1 per head on the sale of live domestic and imported cattle, as well as a comparable assessment on imported beef and beef products. It became mandatory when the program was approved by 79 percent of producers in a 1988 national referendum.