Heterosis is Real
Bob Hough, Executive Secretary, Red Angus Association of America
On July 9, the BeefBlog ran a column, “Is There Value Added Through Cross-Breeding or is Heterosis Just a Theory.” There are two benefits to crossbreeding, breed complementarity and Heterosis. Breed complementarity utilizes the genetic differences between parent breeds to achieve a higher frequency of desired genes for specific traits in the crossbred progeny than could be found within a single breed, hence the strong points of one breed can compensate for weaknesses in another. Heterosis is defined as the percent superiority expressed by crossbred progeny over the average of their straightbred parents. The author confuses the two.
On breed complementarity I will use his own extreme example from 30 years ago: a very large, hard doing Simmental mated to a short “roly-poly” Angus. In this case, you would get excellent breed complementarity with a resulting progeny right for the market. He rightfully points out that breeds look much more alike than they once did. However, this reduces breed complementarity not Heterosis.
Heterosis is just as valid now with today’s breeds as it was 30 years ago. Kress and Nelsen reported calving rate can be increased 6%, calf survival to weaning 4%, weaning rate 8%, weaning weight 11%, milk production 9%, and yearling weight 4%. These are real life numbers in which a crossbreed bred to a third breed increases lifetime production 20 to 25%. And this does not add in the breed complementarity that still exists (although to a lesser degree) in crossbreeding.
Is Heterosis just a theory? No it is a fact, and a grossly underutilized one.
